blogging

Cereal box backbacks and bloggers as distributed cool-hunters
There was a second point to that post, but I was distracted by the photo.
Camp blog
Dude didn't have wi-fi, so he paper and penned it.
Photodude has been catblogging for 9 years
Well, 2 photos and 9 years in between, but hey, that's gotta be some kind of record.
sexyblogger Technorati tag
Weird meme started by Xiaxue
Weblog Madness
Just as seeing Zannah on Flickr, seeing Weblog Madness linked to by Anil Dash brought me back to the days before it was called blogging.

Without Any Specialized Knowledge

Maki: “Growing up, I've always been one of the "other": not white, not "really" American, not even African American, not a man, certainly not Swiss, and not even "really" Japanese. Therefore, I suppose that my tolerence level for being excluded, intentionally or not, is rather high. Now, I admit that I used to care a lot more about this, and so I pushed myself to participate a lot more in the mainstream of at least the Web Design Community. Nowadays because my focus has changed, both professionally and personally, I don't care nearly as much, and I write whatever I feel like, especially on this site. I can certainly understand the frustration of feeling excluded from something. Nevertheless, I can't help feeling uncomfortable with the sometimes strident clamour about these issues, and for creating more and more groups and subgroups of "what's in" as defined by a few.”

Maki is talking about articles suggesting that men dominate blogging and points to Rebecca Blood's notes about actual research showing that if men make up a majority of bloggers, it is a bare majority. Maki writes more about being an outsider in general, and as Bill James writes about 'inside baseball', it's not necessarily better being an insider or an outsider, but different. It's probably a fair statement that a large minority (possibly even a majority) of bloggers are outsiders to the subjects they discuss. I certainly include myself in that group, talking about grime or dating without any specialized knowledge of or without much experience in the subject. That doesn't stop me, and nor should it, really. I have opinions on things just like everybody else does, and they are reflected more in what I point to than what I actually come out and say, because it's easier for me to let people call bullshit on them than it is to let people call bullshit on me.

Mostly the Creamy Middles

Tyme points out and discusses Chris Nolan's assertions about male and female bloggers or, rather, Dave Winer's reaction. Let's for the moment ignore what Dave is saying and focus on Chris' first point: “This medium was first taken up by techies. Most of them are men. It's not worth going into the statistics on men and women in tech, and the reasons and whyfors. There are more men, that's all you need to know for this conversation.” First of all we have a switch in verb tense from the first sentence to the next. I'm happy to agree with the idea that most "bloggers" were techies, or, better put, were able to operate a computer and had a connection to the Internet. So if I interpret what Chris might have been trying to say, i.e. that most of the early "bloggers" were men (also, it's not clear why she says it's not worth going into the statistics when she's making a statistical claim), then hey, maybe that's true. But that ignores the large proportion of women who "blogged" when weblogs used to be called "online diaries". I only remember back to about 1998 or so, but I remember being intrigued not by what fellow nerds were saying, but the stuff that young women my age were writing about. Why? Because I was—and to an extent still am—a young male, young males usually being interested in young females, and, at the very least peripherally, what they have to say about their lives. (Mostly what they look like, but that gets old after a while. Well, no it doesn't, but you know what I mean.) Not necessarily all parts of their lives, but certain aspects of it. The point is that a significant amount of online diarists were women, and not necessarily "techies". They were part of the "Dark Web", that part of the Internet that doesn't get any media attention because it has nothing to do with a) technology, b) politics, or c) impossibly beautiful extrovert women having sex with powerful strangers. It had (and has) to do with normal people (men and women) talking about their day to day lives, their successes and their failures, but mostly the creamy middles and not the terrifying lows or the dizzying highs. So in other words, "this medium" was not started by techies, but by people, male and female. The techies just took credit for it.

The difference between a weblog and forum post
Confirms and adds nuance to my opinion that forum posts have questions at the end of them whereas weblog posts are designed to be informational.
"Règle n°1 : il n'y a pas de règles."
("Rule #1: there are no rules.) That is with regards to blogging. Karl feels exactly how I felt about Tim Bray's presentation at Northern Voice.

Pages