Wikipedia

My Photo of Howard Schultz Adorns His Wikipedia Page

I should know, I put it there.

tags: , , ,
Flickr icon for Kris Krug
Submitted by Kris Krug on Fri 2007-03-02 16:04 #

good stuff man. great shot. :)

Flickr icon for ksigurdson
Submitted by ksigurdson on Tue 2007-03-06 22:30 #

I interviewed Howard Schultz for a grade 9 business education project! Do you think he'd remember me? :)

Flickr icon for sillygwailo
Submitted by sillygwailo on Wed 2007-03-07 16:14 #

Did you interview him in person?

Flickr icon for ksigurdson
Submitted by ksigurdson on Sun 2007-03-11 20:24 #

No, over the phone. It was around 1994 when Starbucks was just starting to getting big.

The above comments will not display in the recently updated section because they are syndicated directly from the Flickr photo.

Vancouver Was the Featured Article on Wikipedia February 7th, 2007

See also my post at Urban Vancouver.

tags: ,
Flickr icon for Kris Krug
Submitted by Kris Krug on Thu 2007-02-08 17:00 #

ha... cool. :)

The above comments will not display in the recently updated section because they are syndicated directly from the Flickr photo.

group: Vancouver

Maybe You Don't Exist

When searching for people who linked to Vancouver real estate bloggers in The Tyee (which includes myself), I mistakenly put the URL in the 'blog directory', and not searching blog posts as intended. Instead of results, I was confronted with this error: “There are blogs, and then there's whatever you just typed in. If it's a blog, we don't know about it. Maybe you made a typo. Or maybe it's a blog that doesn't exist. Maybe you don't exist. (In which case, please ignore this.)” [screenshot]

I still don't like Technorati's use of re="nofollow" (especially relevant in the wake of Wikipedia using the 'rel="nofollow"' attribute on all links), but at least they have a sense of humour on their error messages.

"The Current Negotiated Truth"

A month ago I read Digital Maoism, an article by Jaron Lanier which argued that because so many in the Silicon Valley (and elsewhere) have an unquestioning belief that technology is here to solve all our problems, that extreme views (including, as he argues, collectivism) have mainstream appeal among technologists. I had a hard time with his argument that anonymity and the neutral viewpoint on Wikipedia leads to either bad writing or persistent inaccuracies on the site, but listening to Open Source's episode with Lanier, James Surowiecki and David Weinberger I found myself agreeing with Weinberger the most (Surowiecki and Lanier mostly agreed with each other, disagreeing mostly on emphasis and to which cases the "wisdom of crowds" applies). Where Weinberger argues that “having an extended conversation in which they are trying to get past themselves so they can get to something they agree on and write it down”, Lanier can only disagree by pointing to the discussion pages, which can get pretty raucous. I believe Weinberger meant the pages themselves, which are, in a sense, “extended conversations” towards what Cory Doctorow calls "the current negotiated truth".

Pamela Jones on the Economist open source article and SCO.
Also: "Wikipedia is not an Open Source project."
David Weinberger on Wikipedia
In a footnote, he says that "Wikipedia only has the social context."
Wikipedia is a gateway drug for facts.
You can use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true.

Pages