Timothy Noah presents a theory as to why Paul Wolfowitz was wrong about Iraq this time around: “Wolfowitz was corrupted by early success. Twenty-odd years ago, Wolfowitz took two very lonely positions that proved to be spectacularly right. As a consequence, he developed an unshakable belief that once he's thought through a problem [...] he should ignore the cavils of lesser minds. Time will prove that he's right.”
Timothy Noah seems awfully confident that Wolfowitz was wrong that “post-Saddam Iraq would quickly get back on its feet”. The key word for me is "quickly": I'd be interested to see how Noah and Wolfowitz differ on the definition, it only being a year since Saddam was ousted.