Columbine

What Would Have Been an Otherwise Mundane Day

October 10th, 2004

japh on Elephant directed by Gus Van Sant: “the problem with this movie is that van sant tried to make a statment about youth violence. i wish he had simply stuck to the style of the opening of the film, letting the camera graze on the everyday problems of typical youth. problems with parents. interest in the opposite sex. instead, the film follow the trajectory of two fucked up kids who go on a violent gun-laden rampage through their high-school.”

But that's not all the film does. It follows more trajectories than just the two fucked-up kids who go on a gun-laden rampage through the school. It follows the trajectory of a hunk ("he's sooo cute") who plays football with his friends during a break, then as he goes to find his girlfriend and then sign out of school at the office. It follows the trajectory of the class discussion on homosexuality. It follows the trajectory of a photographer who takes a photo of a punk couple and then his journey back to school. It follows the trajectory of a girl who does not wear shorts to gym class as she walks back to the change room and then to the library. It follows the the trajectory of two girls who are friends gossip about the football hunk but, during lunch, argue about how much time they spend together after class and then proceed to the bathroom where they deal with lunch's aftermath in a way only teenage girls can. It also follows the trajectory of a guy who had to tell his dad to pull over because he was drunk, then drive him to school where he phone his brother to come pick his dad up. The film does everything that japh says it doesn't, and the killers are just one vignette in what would have been an otherwise mundane day. There is, in other words, not just one statement the movie makes, but many, and all of the statements share a theme that parents don't really have a good idea of what really goes on inside high school, some of it very beautiful (like the work of photographer throughout, including the attitude he has at the—or rather his—end) and some of it ugly like the obvious end scene but also the girls in the washroom.

Elephant

September 26th, 2004

Watched Elephant DVD.

This movie reminded me a lot about the characters in my high school and the places within it. The high school in this movie is bigger than mine was, but the kids walking through the halls and the mundanity (but also diversity) of daily high school life comes across really well. Required reading before watching this movie is "The Depressive and the Psychopath" by Dave Cullen. Cullen argues that Eric Harris was the psychopathic mastermind while his partner, Dylan Klebold, while not an unwilling participant, was manipulated into killing his schoolmates. (There is an interesting speculation near the end of the movie about the nature of their partnership.) Harris and Klebold had a much higher bodycount in mind when they started out, and that comes across in the movie as well. This is not a documentary, but it is filmed in documentary-style—without commentary—and my heart was pumping from the beginning. I knew what was going to happen, just not when. It was an uncomfortable movie to watch, not least because the tracking shots often lasted significantly longer than the average film, but just like anything, the uncomfortable movies are usually the most important ones.

The Egotistical Notion

April 24th, 2004

David Brooks refers to Dave Cullen's excellent article in Slate about the Columbine Killers [my commentary]: “it is striking how resilient this perpetrator-as-victim narrative remains. We still sometimes assume that the people who flew planes into buildings — and those who blew up synagogues in Turkey, trains in Spain, discos in Tel Aviv and schoolchildren this week in Basra — are driven by feelings of weakness, resentment and inferiority. We cling to the egotistical notion that it is our economic and political dominance that drives terrorists insane.”

Gunning for Devastating Infamy on the Historical Scale of an Attila the Hun

April 21st, 2004

Dave Cullen: “Columbine was intended not primarily as a shooting at all, but as a bombing on a massive scale. If they hadn't been so bad at wiring the timers, the propane bombs they set in the cafeteria would have wiped out 600 people. After those bombs went off, they planned to gun down fleeing survivors. An explosive third act would follow, when their cars, packed with still more bombs, would rip through still more crowds, presumably of survivors, rescue workers, and reporters. The climax would be captured on live television. It wasn't just "fame" they were after—Agent Fuselier [of the FBI] bristles at that trivializing term—they were gunning for devastating infamy on the historical scale of an Attila the Hun. Their vision was to create a nightmare so devastating and apocalyptic that the entire world would shudder at their power.”

Tom Mangan says that Cullen “deflates the popular myths about the high school massacre”, but that is an understatement. Cullen turns not just the myths (in its urban legend sense) on their head, but show Harris and Klebold (and especially Harris) weren't merely angry teenagers, but contemptuous psychopaths (and psychopaths in the clinical definition of the term, not the popular definition) who took pleasure in manipulating others. They didn't hate the people they killed. Even worse, they didn't care.

Cullen elaborates on his weblog:

Syndicate content